NEWS
Verax AI Risk Assessment is live. See what's exposed
Gling
Gling
 
Risk Overview
Significant Risk
6.3
/10
Video Generation
·
Video Editing
·
Top Risks

Raw video and audio content uploaded to Gling may be retained indefinitely and used for model training with no transparent policy (training_use and data_retention both scored 7). The tool processes sensitive unedited YouTube footage without publicly disclosed security certifications or incident-disclosure practices, creating risk of unauthorized access or data misuse.

Mitigations

Contact Gling directly to confirm: (1) whether user video/audio is used to train AI models, (2) exact data retention and deletion timelines, and (3) which third-party cloud processors handle content. Until policies are clarified, restrict uploads to content without sensitive personal information (names, faces, private conversations).

Get started
Is your team using 
Gling
 
safely?

Highest Risk Categories

The highest-scoring risk categories identified in this assessment.

Training Use

Privacy policy only available as a PDF link (https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/661e4b87a937b4e02f561ea5/665081f8a3a55179bf8a2c06_privacy_policy.pdf) with no accessible web text—PDF was not retrievable. Terms and policy content are therefore largely opaque. Gling processes raw YouTube footage (long-form talking-head videos), transcribes audio, and identifies silences/bad takes. Core product requires substantial processing of users' video and audio content. No public statement found on whether content is used for model training. Rated elevated due to opacity and the sensitive nature of raw unedited video processing.
7
/10

Data Retention

No accessible retention policy text found. PDF-only privacy policy is not retrievable via web fetch. For a tool that processes raw unedited video footage (often containing sensitive personal content, outtakes, etc.), lack of clear retention policy is a significant gap. No deletion guarantee timeline found. Rated elevated due to complete opacity.
7
/10

Security Posture

No security documentation, SOC 2, ISO 27001, or bug bounty program found in public-facing materials. PDF-only privacy policy makes security commitments inaccessible. Small startup with limited public security posture information. Cloud-based processing of raw unedited YouTube footage (which may contain sensitive personal content) without clear security documentation is a notable risk.
7
/10

Unlock the complete assessment

Run a free assessment to access the full AI tool risk analysis.
Start Free Assessment
Updated July 2026 • AI-assisted research • Reviewed by Verax • Report an issue

Reference Documentation

Official documentation and policies referenced as part of this assessment.